Burkina Faso vs Hong Kong, China: Environmental protection n.e.c.
Burkina Faso
2.21 billion
in 2022
Hong Kong, China
1.80 billion
in 2021
Burkina Faso rank
25th
Hong Kong, China rank
28th
Environmental protection n.e.c. over time
- Burkina Faso
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 2.21 billion against 1.80 billion in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 407.38 million.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.2 times Hong Kong, China's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 25th and Hong Kong, China ranks 28th of 92 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 722.79 million | 2.27 billion | 1.54 billion | Hong Kong, China |
| 2020s | 1.05 billion | 1.85 billion | 803.12 million | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection n.e.c., Burkina Faso or Hong Kong, China?
- Burkina Faso, at 2.21 billion against 1.80 billion in Hong Kong, China as of 2022.
- What is the difference in environmental protection n.e.c. between Burkina Faso and Hong Kong, China?
- 407.38 million, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Hong Kong, China?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2021.
- How do Burkina Faso and Hong Kong, China rank globally for environmental protection n.e.c.?
- Burkina Faso ranks 25th and Hong Kong, China ranks 28th of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Environmental protection n.e.c. (Domestic Currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset captures government spending on environmental protection efforts such as pollution abatement, biodiversity conservation, and waste management. These expenditures are classified according to the COFOG framework (Classification of the Functions of Government).