El Salvador vs Papua New Guinea: Environmental protection n.e.c.
El Salvador
7.30 million
in 2021
Papua New Guinea
16.76 million
in 2022
El Salvador rank
75th
Papua New Guinea rank
73rd
Environmental protection n.e.c. over time
- El Salvador
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 16.76 million against 7.30 million in El Salvador, a difference of 9.46 million.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 2.3 times El Salvador's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 75th and Papua New Guinea ranks 73rd of 92 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5.87 million | 20.29 million | 14.43 million | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 10.35 million | 25.16 million | 14.81 million | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection n.e.c., El Salvador or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 16.76 million against 7.30 million in El Salvador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in environmental protection n.e.c. between El Salvador and Papua New Guinea?
- 9.46 million, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Papua New Guinea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2021.
- How do El Salvador and Papua New Guinea rank globally for environmental protection n.e.c.?
- El Salvador ranks 75th and Papua New Guinea ranks 73rd of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Environmental protection n.e.c. (Domestic Currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset captures government spending on environmental protection efforts such as pollution abatement, biodiversity conservation, and waste management. These expenditures are classified according to the COFOG framework (Classification of the Functions of Government).