Luxembourg vs Slovenia: Environmental protection n.e.c.
Luxembourg
41.97 million
in 2022
Slovenia
24.48 million
in 2021
Luxembourg rank
67th
Slovenia rank
70th
Environmental protection n.e.c. over time
- Luxembourg
- Slovenia
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 41.97 million against 24.48 million in Slovenia, a difference of 17.49 million.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.7 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Slovenia ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 67th and Slovenia ranks 70th of 92 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.86 million | 9.56 million | 4.70 million | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 9.71 million | 33.43 million | 23.72 million | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 17.47 million | 28.57 million | 11.10 million | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 36.26 million | 24.33 million | 11.93 million | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection n.e.c., Luxembourg or Slovenia?
- Luxembourg, at 41.97 million against 24.48 million in Slovenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in environmental protection n.e.c. between Luxembourg and Slovenia?
- 17.49 million, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Slovenia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
- How do Luxembourg and Slovenia rank globally for environmental protection n.e.c.?
- Luxembourg ranks 67th and Slovenia ranks 70th of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Environmental protection n.e.c. (Domestic Currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset captures government spending on environmental protection efforts such as pollution abatement, biodiversity conservation, and waste management. These expenditures are classified according to the COFOG framework (Classification of the Functions of Government).