Hong Kong vs Lithuania: Environmental taxes, Taxes on transport (excluding fuel for transport)

Hong Kong
56.00 million
in 2021
Lithuania
51.22 million
in 2022
Hong Kong rank
103rd
Lithuania rank
104th

Environmental taxes, Taxes on transport (excluding fuel for transport) over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Lithuania
01.0B2.0B3.0B199520082022

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 56.00 million against 51.22 million in Lithuania, a difference of 4.78 million.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Lithuania ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 103rd and Lithuania ranks 104th of 119 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 0 6.02 million 6.02 million Lithuania
2000s 0 14.83 million 14.83 million Lithuania
2010s 2.35 billion 17.64 million 2.33 billion Hong Kong
2020s 78.50 million 44.45 million 34.05 million Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmental taxes, taxes on transport (excluding fuel for transport), Hong Kong or Lithuania?
Hong Kong, at 56.00 million against 51.22 million in Lithuania as of 2021.
What is the difference in environmental taxes, taxes on transport (excluding fuel for transport) between Hong Kong and Lithuania?
4.78 million, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Lithuania?
27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
How do Hong Kong and Lithuania rank globally for environmental taxes, taxes on transport (excluding fuel for transport)?
Hong Kong ranks 103rd and Lithuania ranks 104th of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Environmental taxes, Taxes on transport (excluding fuel for transport) (Domestic Currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Lithuania: Environmental taxes, Taxes on transport (excluding fuel for transport). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/environmental-taxes-taxes-on-transport-excluding-fuel-for-transport-domestic-currency/hong-kong-sar-china/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/environmental-taxes-taxes-on-transport-excluding-fuel-for-transport-domestic-currency/hong-kong-sar-china/lithuania/">Hong Kong vs Lithuania: Environmental taxes, Taxes on transport (excluding fuel for transport)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmental taxes, Taxes on transport (excluding fuel for transport) (Domestic Currency)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
119 places, 2,394 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

This dataset tracks government revenue from taxes imposed on activities that negatively impact the environment. These taxes are categorized into four types: energy taxes (including fuel for transport), transport taxes (excluding fuel for transport), pollution taxes, and resource taxes.