Honduras vs Latvia: Excises, Ratio of this level of government's revenue from this item
Honduras
1
in 2015
Latvia
1
in 2020
Honduras rank
1st
Latvia rank
1st
Excises, Ratio of this level of government's revenue from this item over time
- Honduras
- Latvia
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 1 against 1 in Latvia, a difference of 0.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Honduras ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 73 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher excises, ratio of this level of government's revenue from this item, Honduras or Latvia?
- Honduras, at 1 against 1 in Latvia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in excises, ratio of this level of government's revenue from this item between Honduras and Latvia?
- 0, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Latvia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2015.
- How do Honduras and Latvia rank globally for excises, ratio of this level of government's revenue from this item?
- Honduras ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 73 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Excises, Ratio of this level of government's revenue from this item to total general government revenue from this item, Percent (Central government). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.