Brazil vs Poland: Goods and services expense
Goods and services expense over time
- Brazil
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 99.35 billion current LCU against 82.27 billion current LCU in Brazil, a difference of 17.08 billion current LCU.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 64th and Poland ranks 61st of 155 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 49.23 billion current LCU | 42.46 billion current LCU | 6.77 billion current LCU | Brazil |
| 2020s | 69.05 billion current LCU | 78.97 billion current LCU | 9.92 billion current LCU | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher goods and services expense, Brazil or Poland?
- Poland, at 99.35 billion current LCU against 82.27 billion current LCU in Brazil as of 2023.
- What is the difference in goods and services expense between Brazil and Poland?
- 17.08 billion current LCU, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Poland?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Poland rank globally for goods and services expense?
- Brazil ranks 64th and Poland ranks 61st of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Goods and services expense (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Goods and services include all government payments in exchange for goods and services used for the production of market and nonmarket goods and services. Use of goods and services for account capital formation is excluded. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.