Chile vs Tanzania: Goods and services expense
Goods and services expense over time
- Chile
- Tanzania
How they compare
Chile currently reports 6.03 trillion current LCU against 5.30 trillion current LCU in Tanzania, a difference of 728.14 billion current LCU.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 11th and Tanzania ranks 13th of 155 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.85 trillion current LCU | 866.63 billion current LCU | 978.95 billion current LCU | Chile |
| 2010s | 2.87 trillion current LCU | 2.02 trillion current LCU | 847.69 billion current LCU | Chile |
| 2020s | 5.17 trillion current LCU | 3.54 trillion current LCU | 1.63 trillion current LCU | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher goods and services expense, Chile or Tanzania?
- Chile, at 6.03 trillion current LCU against 5.30 trillion current LCU in Tanzania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in goods and services expense between Chile and Tanzania?
- 728.14 billion current LCU, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Tanzania?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Tanzania rank globally for goods and services expense?
- Chile ranks 11th and Tanzania ranks 13th of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Goods and services expense (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Goods and services include all government payments in exchange for goods and services used for the production of market and nonmarket goods and services. Use of goods and services for account capital formation is excluded. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.