Guinea-Bissau vs Nepal: Goods and services expense
Goods and services expense over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Nepal
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 57.26 billion current LCU against 50.39 billion current LCU in Nepal, a difference of 6.87 billion current LCU.
That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Nepal ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 69th and Nepal ranks 72nd of 155 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 35.26 billion current LCU | 52.81 billion current LCU | 17.55 billion current LCU | Nepal |
| 2020s | 52.01 billion current LCU | 40.67 billion current LCU | 11.35 billion current LCU | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher goods and services expense, Guinea-Bissau or Nepal?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 57.26 billion current LCU against 50.39 billion current LCU in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in goods and services expense between Guinea-Bissau and Nepal?
- 6.87 billion current LCU, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Nepal?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Nepal rank globally for goods and services expense?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 69th and Nepal ranks 72nd of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Goods and services expense (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Goods and services include all government payments in exchange for goods and services used for the production of market and nonmarket goods and services. Use of goods and services for account capital formation is excluded. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.