Iraq vs Uganda: Goods and services expense

Iraq
9.45 trillion current LCU
in 2019
Uganda
10.37 trillion current LCU
in 2024
Iraq rank
9th
Uganda rank
7th

Goods and services expense over time

  • Iraq
  • Uganda
4.0T6.0T8.0T10.0T201420192024

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 10.37 trillion current LCU against 9.45 trillion current LCU in Iraq, a difference of 917.79 billion current LCU.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Iraq's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Iraq has been ahead every year.

Iraq ranks 9th and Uganda ranks 7th of 155 countries.

Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher goods and services expense, Iraq or Uganda?
Uganda, at 10.37 trillion current LCU against 9.45 trillion current LCU in Iraq as of 2024.
What is the difference in goods and services expense between Iraq and Uganda?
917.79 billion current LCU, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Uganda?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Iraq and Uganda rank globally for goods and services expense?
Iraq ranks 9th and Uganda ranks 7th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Goods and services expense (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Goods and services expense (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
155 places, 4,479 data points, 1972–2024
Last refreshed

Goods and services include all government payments in exchange for goods and services used for the production of market and nonmarket goods and services. Use of goods and services for account capital formation is excluded. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.