Myanmar vs Tanzania: Goods and services expense

Myanmar
7.10 trillion current LCU
in 2019
Tanzania
5.30 trillion current LCU
in 2024
Myanmar rank
10th
Tanzania rank
13th

Goods and services expense over time

  • Myanmar
  • Tanzania
02.0T4.0T6.0T8.0T200920162024

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 7.10 trillion current LCU against 5.30 trillion current LCU in Tanzania, a difference of 1.79 trillion current LCU.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.3 times Tanzania's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.

Myanmar ranks 10th and Tanzania ranks 13th of 155 countries.

Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher goods and services expense, Myanmar or Tanzania?
Myanmar, at 7.10 trillion current LCU against 5.30 trillion current LCU in Tanzania as of 2019.
What is the difference in goods and services expense between Myanmar and Tanzania?
1.79 trillion current LCU, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Tanzania?
8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
How do Myanmar and Tanzania rank globally for goods and services expense?
Myanmar ranks 10th and Tanzania ranks 13th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Goods and services expense (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Goods and services expense (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
155 places, 4,479 data points, 1972–2024
Last refreshed

Goods and services include all government payments in exchange for goods and services used for the production of market and nonmarket goods and services. Use of goods and services for account capital formation is excluded. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.