Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Naoero: Goods and services expense
Goods and services expense over time
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- Naoero
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 35.6% against 20.7% in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 14.9%.
That makes Naoero's figure about 1.7 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Naoero has been ahead every year.
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 7th and Naoero ranks 8th of 41 groups.
Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) | Naoero | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 22.4% | 53.2% | 30.8% | Naoero |
| 2020s | 17.4% | 35.6% | 18.2% | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher goods and services expense, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Naoero?
- Naoero, at 35.6% against 20.7% in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2020.
- What is the difference in goods and services expense between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Naoero?
- 14.9%, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Naoero?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Naoero rank globally for goods and services expense?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 7th and Naoero ranks 8th of 41 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Goods and services expense (% of expense). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Goods and services include all government payments in exchange for goods and services used for the production of market and nonmarket goods and services. Use of goods and services for own account capital formation is excluded. This indicator is expressed as percentage of total expenses which is any decrease in net worth resulting from a transaction.