Honduras vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Goods and services expense
Goods and services expense over time
- Honduras
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 16.1% against 15.8% in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Honduras ahead.
Honduras ranks 66th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 69th of 154 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.7% | 14.7% | 2.0% | Honduras |
| 2010s | 15.3% | 19.0% | 3.6% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2020s | 16.1% | 9.1% | 6.9% | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher goods and services expense, Honduras or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Honduras, at 16.1% against 15.8% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2020.
- What is the difference in goods and services expense between Honduras and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.3%, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Honduras and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for goods and services expense?
- Honduras ranks 66th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 69th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Goods and services expense (% of expense). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Goods and services include all government payments in exchange for goods and services used for the production of market and nonmarket goods and services. Use of goods and services for own account capital formation is excluded. This indicator is expressed as percentage of total expenses which is any decrease in net worth resulting from a transaction.