Naoero vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Goods and services expense
Goods and services expense over time
- Naoero
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 35.6% against 19.7% in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 15.9%.
That makes Naoero's figure about 1.8 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Naoero has been ahead every year.
Naoero ranks 8th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 9th of 154 countries.
Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Naoero | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 53.2% | 21.6% | 31.5% | Naoero |
| 2020s | 35.6% | 17.3% | 18.3% | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher goods and services expense, Naoero or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Naoero, at 35.6% against 19.7% in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2020.
- What is the difference in goods and services expense between Naoero and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 15.9%, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Naoero and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for goods and services expense?
- Naoero ranks 8th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 9th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Goods and services expense (% of expense). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Goods and services include all government payments in exchange for goods and services used for the production of market and nonmarket goods and services. Use of goods and services for own account capital formation is excluded. This indicator is expressed as percentage of total expenses which is any decrease in net worth resulting from a transaction.