Australia vs Chinese Taipei: Government budget allocations for R&D — Government Allocations for R&D

Australia
6,013 US dollars, PPP converted
in 2025
Chinese Taipei
9,085 US dollars, PPP converted
in 2024
Australia rank
10th
Chinese Taipei rank
8th

Government budget allocations for R&D — Government Allocations for R&D over time

  • Australia
  • Chinese Taipei
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k198120032025

How they compare

Chinese Taipei currently reports 9,085 US dollars, PPP converted against 6,013 US dollars, PPP converted in Australia, a difference of 3,072 US dollars, PPP converted.

That makes Chinese Taipei's figure about 1.5 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 10th and Chinese Taipei ranks 8th of 31 countries.

Chinese Taipei has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Chinese Taipei Difference Ahead
2000s 5,086 US dollars, PPP converted 6,174 US dollars, PPP converted 1,088 US dollars, PPP converted Chinese Taipei
2010s 5,556 US dollars, PPP converted 8,139 US dollars, PPP converted 2,582 US dollars, PPP converted Chinese Taipei
2020s 5,861 US dollars, PPP converted 8,649 US dollars, PPP converted 2,788 US dollars, PPP converted Chinese Taipei

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government budget allocations for r&d — government allocations for r&d, Australia or Chinese Taipei?
Chinese Taipei, at 9,085 US dollars, PPP converted against 6,013 US dollars, PPP converted in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in government budget allocations for r&d — government allocations for r&d between Australia and Chinese Taipei?
3,072 US dollars, PPP converted, with Chinese Taipei ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Chinese Taipei?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Australia and Chinese Taipei rank globally for government budget allocations for r&d — government allocations for r&d?
Australia ranks 10th and Chinese Taipei ranks 8th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Government budget allocations for R&D — Government Allocations for R&D (GBARD). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Chinese Taipei: Government budget allocations for R&D — Government Allocations for R&D. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/government-budget-allocations-for-r-and-d-government-allocations-for-r-and-d-gbard/australia/taiwan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/government-budget-allocations-for-r-and-d-government-allocations-for-r-and-d-gbard/australia/taiwan/">Australia vs Chinese Taipei: Government budget allocations for R&D — Government Allocations for R&D</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government budget allocations for R&D — Government Allocations for R&D (GBARD)
Unit
US dollars, PPP converted
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
43 places, 1,446 data points, 1981–2025
Last refreshed

This table contains data on Government budget allocations for R&D (GBARD) by socio-economic objective (SEO), using the NABS 2007 classification