Brazil vs Mauritania: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices
Brazil
2.2
in 2019
Mauritania
2.17
in 2019
Brazil rank
145th
Mauritania rank
147th
Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices over time
- Brazil
- Mauritania
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 2.2 against 2.17 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.03.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 145th and Mauritania ranks 147th of 173 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.2 | 5.95 | 2.26 | Brazil |
| 1970s | 7.19 | 4.25 | 2.94 | Brazil |
| 1980s | 5.67 | 3.18 | 2.48 | Brazil |
| 1990s | 6.1 | 2.08 | 4.03 | Brazil |
| 2000s | 4.21 | 3.29 | 0.9268 | Brazil |
| 2010s | 3.67 | 3.07 | 0.6027 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices, Brazil or Mauritania?
- Brazil, at 2.2 against 2.17 in Mauritania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices between Brazil and Mauritania?
- 0.03, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Mauritania?
- 60 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Mauritania rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices?
- Brazil ranks 145th and Mauritania ranks 147th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.