Canada vs Sri Lanka: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices
Canada
3.87
in 2019
Sri Lanka
3.79
in 2019
Canada rank
86th
Sri Lanka rank
88th
Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices over time
- Canada
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Canada currently reports 3.87 against 3.79 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.08.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Canada ranks 86th and Sri Lanka ranks 88th of 173 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 4 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.29 | 4.48 | 0.1936 | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 3.44 | 4.19 | 0.7456 | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 3.13 | 3.09 | 0.0437 | Canada |
| 1990s | 3.36 | 1.74 | 1.62 | Canada |
| 2000s | 3.71 | 2.22 | 1.49 | Canada |
| 2010s | 4.08 | 3.5 | 0.5719 | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices, Canada or Sri Lanka?
- Canada, at 3.87 against 3.79 in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices between Canada and Sri Lanka?
- 0.08, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Sri Lanka?
- 60 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2019.
- How do Canada and Sri Lanka rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices?
- Canada ranks 86th and Sri Lanka ranks 88th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.