Congo vs Singapore: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices
Congo
4.51
in 2019
Singapore
4.65
in 2019
Congo rank
63rd
Singapore rank
60th
Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices over time
- Congo
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 4.65 against 4.51 in Congo, a difference of 0.14.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Singapore ahead.
Congo ranks 63rd and Singapore ranks 60th of 173 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.09 | 7.5 | 2.41 | Singapore |
| 1970s | 4.29 | 6.74 | 2.45 | Singapore |
| 1980s | 5.01 | 9.3 | 4.3 | Singapore |
| 1990s | 1.91 | 6.18 | 4.27 | Singapore |
| 2000s | 4.54 | 4.8 | 0.2683 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 7.19 | 4.76 | 2.42 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices, Congo or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 4.65 against 4.51 in Congo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices between Congo and Singapore?
- 0.14, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Singapore?
- 60 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2019.
- How do Congo and Singapore rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices?
- Congo ranks 63rd and Singapore ranks 60th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.