Ecuador vs Mongolia: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices
Ecuador
6.39
in 2019
Mongolia
6.75
in 2019
Ecuador rank
32nd
Mongolia rank
29th
Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices over time
- Ecuador
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 6.75 against 6.39 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.36.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mongolia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 32nd and Mongolia ranks 29th of 173 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 6.62 | 31.36 | 24.73 | Mongolia |
| 1980s | 6.42 | 30.12 | 23.7 | Mongolia |
| 1990s | 4.83 | 9.17 | 4.33 | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 6.36 | 5.16 | 1.2 | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 11.59 | 5.97 | 5.62 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices, Ecuador or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 6.75 against 6.39 in Ecuador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices between Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 0.36, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Mongolia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices?
- Ecuador ranks 32nd and Mongolia ranks 29th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.