Georgia vs Hong Kong, China: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices
Georgia
5.95
in 2019
Hong Kong, China
5.8
in 2019
Georgia rank
40th
Hong Kong, China rank
43rd
Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices over time
- Georgia
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 5.95 against 5.8 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.15.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 40th and Hong Kong, China ranks 43rd of 173 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.04 | 5.03 | 0.9871 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2000s | 3.32 | 4.69 | 1.37 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 4.38 | 5.76 | 1.38 | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices, Georgia or Hong Kong, China?
- Georgia, at 5.95 against 5.8 in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices between Georgia and Hong Kong, China?
- 0.15, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Hong Kong, China?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Georgia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices?
- Georgia ranks 40th and Hong Kong, China ranks 43rd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.