Georgia vs Malaysia: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices
Georgia
5.95
in 2019
Malaysia
6.23
in 2019
Georgia rank
40th
Malaysia rank
37th
Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices over time
- Georgia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 6.23 against 5.95 in Georgia, a difference of 0.28.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 40th and Malaysia ranks 37th of 173 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.04 | 9.1 | 5.06 | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 3.32 | 10.48 | 7.16 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 4.38 | 9.01 | 4.63 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices, Georgia or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 6.23 against 5.95 in Georgia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices between Georgia and Malaysia?
- 0.28, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Malaysia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Georgia and Malaysia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices?
- Georgia ranks 40th and Malaysia ranks 37th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.