Ghana vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices
Ghana
0.9861
in 2019
Zimbabwe
0.6729
in 2008
Ghana rank
172nd
Zimbabwe rank
173rd
Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices over time
- Ghana
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 0.9861 against 0.6729 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.3132.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.5 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 172nd and Zimbabwe ranks 173rd of 173 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.88 | 1.78 | 0.0914 | Ghana |
| 1970s | 1.93 | 1.31 | 0.6193 | Ghana |
| 1980s | 1.37 | 1.02 | 0.3432 | Ghana |
| 1990s | 2.03 | 0.8479 | 1.18 | Ghana |
| 2000s | 2.86 | 3.23 | 0.3627 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices, Ghana or Zimbabwe?
- Ghana, at 0.9861 against 0.6729 in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices between Ghana and Zimbabwe?
- 0.3132, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Zimbabwe?
- 49 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2008.
- How do Ghana and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices?
- Ghana ranks 172nd and Zimbabwe ranks 173rd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.