Guinea-Bissau vs Kazakhstan: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices
Guinea-Bissau
1.62
in 2019
Kazakhstan
1.56
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau rank
162nd
Kazakhstan rank
165th
Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 1.62 against 1.56 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.06.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 162nd and Kazakhstan ranks 165th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.51 | 1.07 | 2.44 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2000s | 1.67 | 1.81 | 0.1405 | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 1.89 | 2.17 | 0.2794 | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices, Guinea-Bissau or Kazakhstan?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 1.62 against 1.56 in Kazakhstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices between Guinea-Bissau and Kazakhstan?
- 0.06, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Kazakhstan?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Kazakhstan rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 162nd and Kazakhstan ranks 165th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.