Kazakhstan vs Sierra Leone: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices
Kazakhstan
1.56
in 2019
Sierra Leone
1.57
in 2019
Kazakhstan rank
165th
Sierra Leone rank
163rd
Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices over time
- Kazakhstan
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 1.57 against 1.56 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.01.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 165th and Sierra Leone ranks 163rd of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Sierra Leone in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.07 | 1.4 | 0.3382 | Sierra Leone |
| 2000s | 1.81 | 1.46 | 0.3546 | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 2.17 | 3.01 | 0.834 | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices, Kazakhstan or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 1.57 against 1.56 in Kazakhstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices between Kazakhstan and Sierra Leone?
- 0.01, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Sierra Leone?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Kazakhstan and Sierra Leone rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices?
- Kazakhstan ranks 165th and Sierra Leone ranks 163rd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.