Malaysia vs Myanmar: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices
Malaysia
6.23
in 2019
Myanmar
6.31
in 2019
Malaysia rank
37th
Myanmar rank
34th
Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices over time
- Malaysia
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 6.31 against 6.23 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.08.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 58 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 37th and Myanmar ranks 34th of 173 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6.19 | 0.906 | 5.28 | Malaysia |
| 1970s | 6.02 | 1.09 | 4.93 | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 9.61 | 1.36 | 8.24 | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 9.1 | 2.09 | 7.01 | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 10.48 | 4.04 | 6.44 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 9.01 | 6.49 | 2.53 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices, Malaysia or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 6.31 against 6.23 in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices between Malaysia and Myanmar?
- 0.08, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Myanmar?
- 58 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Myanmar rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices?
- Malaysia ranks 37th and Myanmar ranks 34th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.