Nicaragua vs Sweden: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices
Nicaragua
4.57
in 2019
Sweden
4.51
in 2019
Nicaragua rank
61st
Sweden rank
64th
Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices over time
- Nicaragua
- Sweden
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 4.57 against 4.51 in Sweden, a difference of 0.06.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Sweden ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 61st and Sweden ranks 64th of 173 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4 | 6.28 | 2.28 | Sweden |
| 1970s | 3.44 | 6.13 | 2.69 | Sweden |
| 1980s | 4 | 4.63 | 0.6359 | Sweden |
| 1990s | 3.62 | 4.87 | 1.25 | Sweden |
| 2000s | 3.18 | 4.07 | 0.8831 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 4.31 | 4.23 | 0.0791 | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices, Nicaragua or Sweden?
- Nicaragua, at 4.57 against 4.51 in Sweden as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices between Nicaragua and Sweden?
- 0.06, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Sweden?
- 60 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2019.
- How do Nicaragua and Sweden rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices?
- Nicaragua ranks 61st and Sweden ranks 64th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.