Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices

Bahamas
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2019
Zimbabwe
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2008
Bahamas rank
168th
Zimbabwe rank
165th

Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices over time

  • Bahamas
  • Zimbabwe
0000196019892019

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Bahamas, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Bahamas's.

Across all 49 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 168th and Zimbabwe ranks 165th of 171 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
1970s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
1980s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
1990s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2000s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices, Bahamas or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Bahamas as of 2008.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices between Bahamas and Zimbabwe?
0 units per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Zimbabwe?
49 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2008.
How do Bahamas and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices?
Bahamas ranks 168th and Zimbabwe ranks 165th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-general-government-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-3/bahamas-the/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-general-government-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-3/bahamas-the/zimbabwe/">Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 8,810 data points, 1960–2019
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017 divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.