Chile vs Nigeria: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices

Chile
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Nigeria
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Chile rank
117th
Nigeria rank
119th

Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices over time

  • Chile
  • Nigeria
0000196119902019

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Nigeria, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Nigeria's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nigeria ahead.

Chile ranks 117th and Nigeria ranks 119th of 170 countries.

Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Nigeria Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Nigeria
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Nigeria
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Nigeria
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Nigeria
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Nigeria
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices, Chile or Nigeria?
Chile, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Nigeria as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices between Chile and Nigeria?
0 units per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Nigeria?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Chile and Nigeria rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices?
Chile ranks 117th and Nigeria ranks 119th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Nigeria: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-general-government-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-4/chile/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-general-government-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-4/chile/nigeria/">Chile vs Nigeria: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,126 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017 divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.