China vs Denmark: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices

China
0.0003 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Denmark
0.0003 units per square kilometre
in 2019
China rank
20th
Denmark rank
22nd

Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices over time

  • China
  • Denmark
00000196119902019

How they compare

China currently reports 0.0003 units per square kilometre against 0.0003 units per square kilometre in Denmark, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Denmark's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Denmark ahead.

China ranks 20th and Denmark ranks 22nd of 170 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Denmark Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre Denmark
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices, China or Denmark?
China, at 0.0003 units per square kilometre against 0.0003 units per square kilometre in Denmark as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices between China and Denmark?
0 units per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Denmark?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do China and Denmark rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices?
China ranks 20th and Denmark ranks 22nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Denmark: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-general-government-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-4/china/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-general-government-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-4/china/denmark/">China vs Denmark: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,126 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017 divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.