Iceland vs Zambia: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices

Iceland
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Zambia
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Iceland rank
143rd
Zambia rank
145th

Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices over time

  • Iceland
  • Zambia
00000196119902019

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 143rd and Zambia ranks 145th of 170 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices, Iceland or Zambia?
Iceland, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices between Iceland and Zambia?
0 units per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Zambia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Iceland and Zambia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices?
Iceland ranks 143rd and Zambia ranks 145th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Zambia: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-general-government-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-4/iceland/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-general-government-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-4/iceland/zambia/">Iceland vs Zambia: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,126 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017 divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.