Mozambique vs Suriname: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices

Mozambique
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Suriname
0 units per square kilometre
in 2010
Mozambique rank
152nd
Suriname rank
149th

Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices over time

  • Mozambique
  • Suriname
00000196119902019

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.2 times Mozambique's.

Across all 50 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Mozambique ranks 152nd and Suriname ranks 149th of 170 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Suriname
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices, Mozambique or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2010.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices between Mozambique and Suriname?
0 units per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Suriname?
50 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2010.
How do Mozambique and Suriname rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices?
Mozambique ranks 152nd and Suriname ranks 149th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Suriname: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-general-government-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-4/mozambique/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-general-government-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-4/mozambique/suriname/">Mozambique vs Suriname: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,126 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017 divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.