Belarus vs Nepal: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices
Belarus
4.35
in 2013
Nepal
4.29
in 2019
Belarus rank
81st
Nepal rank
83rd
Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices over time
- Belarus
- Nepal
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 4.35 against 4.29 in Nepal, a difference of 0.06.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 81st and Nepal ranks 83rd of 173 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 4 and Nepal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4478 | 0.1816 | 0.2663 | Belarus |
| 1970s | 0.6629 | 0.3721 | 0.2908 | Belarus |
| 1980s | 0.9813 | 1.01 | 0.031 | Nepal |
| 1990s | 1.09 | 1.32 | 0.2287 | Nepal |
| 2000s | 2.08 | 0.7226 | 1.36 | Belarus |
| 2010s | 3.62 | 1.2 | 2.41 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices, Belarus or Nepal?
- Belarus, at 4.35 against 4.29 in Nepal as of 2013.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices between Belarus and Nepal?
- 0.06, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Nepal?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2013.
- How do Belarus and Nepal rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices?
- Belarus ranks 81st and Nepal ranks 83rd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.