Hong Kong, China vs Uzbekistan: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices

Hong Kong, China
21.55
in 2019
Uzbekistan
19.52
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
37th
Uzbekistan rank
40th

Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Uzbekistan
0510152025196019892019

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 21.55 against 19.52 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 2.03.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Uzbekistan ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 37th and Uzbekistan ranks 40th of 173 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 4 and Uzbekistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7096 1.69 0.9847 Uzbekistan
1970s 1.91 2.51 0.5964 Uzbekistan
1980s 4.52 3.71 0.8109 Hong Kong, China
1990s 8.67 4.89 3.79 Hong Kong, China
2000s 10.89 5.24 5.66 Hong Kong, China
2010s 19.73 8.22 11.51 Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices, Hong Kong, China or Uzbekistan?
Hong Kong, China, at 21.55 against 19.52 in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices between Hong Kong, China and Uzbekistan?
2.03, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Uzbekistan?
60 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2019.
How do Hong Kong, China and Uzbekistan rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices?
Hong Kong, China ranks 37th and Uzbekistan ranks 40th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Uzbekistan: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-general-government-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity/hong-kong-sar-china/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-general-government-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity/hong-kong-sar-china/uzbekistan/">Hong Kong, China vs Uzbekistan: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
173 places, 10,290 data points, 1960–2019
Last refreshed

This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.