Libya vs Mexico: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices
Libya
48.73
in 2008
Mexico
52.14
in 2019
Libya rank
23rd
Mexico rank
20th
Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices over time
- Libya
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 52.14 against 48.73 in Libya, a difference of 3.41.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 23rd and Mexico ranks 20th of 173 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 2 and Mexico in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 28.17 | 6.76 | 21.42 | Libya |
| 1970s | 48.41 | 14.13 | 34.28 | Libya |
| 1980s | 44.67 | 46.33 | 1.66 | Mexico |
| 1990s | 31.68 | 34.21 | 2.53 | Mexico |
| 2000s | 41.75 | 64.18 | 22.43 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices, Libya or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 52.14 against 48.73 in Libya as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices between Libya and Mexico?
- 3.41, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Mexico?
- 49 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2008.
- How do Libya and Mexico rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, general government, constant prices?
- Libya ranks 23rd and Mexico ranks 20th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.