Eswatini vs Luxembourg: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Current prices
Eswatini
2.77
in 2019
Luxembourg
2.56
in 2019
Eswatini rank
142nd
Luxembourg rank
143rd
Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Current prices over time
- Eswatini
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 2.77 against 2.56 in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.21.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Eswatini ranks 142nd and Luxembourg ranks 143rd of 174 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Luxembourg in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.344 | 0.6153 | 0.2713 | Luxembourg |
| 2000s | 1.44 | 1.27 | 0.1706 | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 3.05 | 2.02 | 1.03 | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, general government, current prices, Eswatini or Luxembourg?
- Eswatini, at 2.77 against 2.56 in Luxembourg as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, general government, current prices between Eswatini and Luxembourg?
- 0.21, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Luxembourg?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Eswatini and Luxembourg rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, general government, current prices?
- Eswatini ranks 142nd and Luxembourg ranks 143rd of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Current prices, Domestic currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.