Grenada vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Current prices
Grenada
0.0938
in 2019
Zimbabwe
0.0205
in 2008
Grenada rank
173rd
Zimbabwe rank
174th
Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Current prices over time
- Grenada
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0.0938 against 0.0205 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0733.
That makes Grenada's figure about 4.6 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Grenada ranks 173rd and Zimbabwe ranks 174th of 174 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.007 | 0.0217 | 0.0147 | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 0.0381 | 0.0476 | 0.0095 | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 0.0806 | 0.0559 | 0.0248 | Grenada |
| 2000s | 0.1719 | 0.0959 | 0.076 | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, general government, current prices, Grenada or Zimbabwe?
- Grenada, at 0.0938 against 0.0205 in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, general government, current prices between Grenada and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0733, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Zimbabwe?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2008.
- How do Grenada and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, general government, current prices?
- Grenada ranks 173rd and Zimbabwe ranks 174th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Current prices, Domestic currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.