Macau, China vs Tajikistan: Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Current prices
Macau, China
12.94
in 2019
Tajikistan
13.55
in 2019
Macau, China rank
117th
Tajikistan rank
116th
Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Current prices over time
- Macau, China
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 13.55 against 12.94 in Macau, China, a difference of 0.61.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Macau, China ahead.
Macau, China ranks 117th and Tajikistan ranks 116th of 174 countries.
Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macau, China | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.38 | 0.0262 | 2.36 | Macau, China |
| 2000s | 2.82 | 0.8916 | 1.93 | Macau, China |
| 2010s | 10.4 | 8.57 | 1.83 | Macau, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, general government, current prices, Macau, China or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 13.55 against 12.94 in Macau, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, general government, current prices between Macau, China and Tajikistan?
- 0.61, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and Tajikistan?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Macau, China and Tajikistan rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, general government, current prices?
- Macau, China ranks 117th and Tajikistan ranks 116th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, General government, Current prices, Domestic currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.