Lithuania vs Sri Lanka: Gross fixed capital formation, Public private partnership, Constant
Lithuania
0.0216
in 2019
Sri Lanka
0.0194
in 2019
Lithuania rank
85th
Sri Lanka rank
87th
Gross fixed capital formation, Public private partnership, Constant over time
- Lithuania
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.0216 against 0.0194 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.0022.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Lithuania ranks 85th and Sri Lanka ranks 87th of 142 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 | 0.063 | 0.063 | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 0 | 0.201 | 0.201 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0.0116 | 0.1717 | 0.1602 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, public private partnership, constant, Lithuania or Sri Lanka?
- Lithuania, at 0.0216 against 0.0194 in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, public private partnership, constant between Lithuania and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0022, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sri Lanka?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Lithuania and Sri Lanka rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, public private partnership, constant?
- Lithuania ranks 85th and Sri Lanka ranks 87th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, Public private partnership, Constant prices, Percent of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.