Australia vs Kyrgyzstan: Housing and community amenities, Ratio of this level of government's
Housing and community amenities, Ratio of this level of government's over time
- Australia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.2729 against 0.2233 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.0496.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Australia ranks 30th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 32nd of 59 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher housing and community amenities, ratio of this level of government's, Australia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Australia, at 0.2729 against 0.2233 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in housing and community amenities, ratio of this level of government's between Australia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.0496, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for housing and community amenities, ratio of this level of government's?
- Australia ranks 30th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 32nd of 59 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Housing and community amenities, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on this item to total general government expenditure on this, Percent (Central government). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.