Kyrgyzstan vs Sweden: Housing and community amenities, Ratio of this level of government's
Housing and community amenities, Ratio of this level of government's over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 0.2549 against 0.2233 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.0316.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 32nd and Sweden ranks 31st of 59 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher housing and community amenities, ratio of this level of government's, Kyrgyzstan or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 0.2549 against 0.2233 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in housing and community amenities, ratio of this level of government's between Kyrgyzstan and Sweden?
- 0.0316, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Sweden?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Sweden rank globally for housing and community amenities, ratio of this level of government's?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 32nd and Sweden ranks 31st of 59 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Housing and community amenities, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on this item to total general government expenditure on this, Percent (Central government). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.