Africa Eastern and Southern vs Guinea: IDA resource allocation index

Africa Eastern and Southern
2.96 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Guinea
3.35 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Africa Eastern and Southern rank
36th
Guinea rank
37th

IDA resource allocation index over time

  • Africa Eastern and Southern
  • Guinea
0123200520152025

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 3.35 1=low to 6=high against 2.96 1=low to 6=high in Africa Eastern and Southern, a difference of 0.39 1=low to 6=high.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Africa Eastern and Southern's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Africa Eastern and Southern ahead.

Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 36th and Guinea ranks 37th of 42 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Africa Eastern and Southern averaged higher in 2 and Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa Eastern and Southern Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 3.13 1=low to 6=high 2.96 1=low to 6=high 0.1772 1=low to 6=high Africa Eastern and Southern
2010s 3.08 1=low to 6=high 3.04 1=low to 6=high 0.04 1=low to 6=high Africa Eastern and Southern
2020s 2.97 1=low to 6=high 3.34 1=low to 6=high 0.3685 1=low to 6=high Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Africa Eastern and Southern or Guinea?
Guinea, at 3.35 1=low to 6=high against 2.96 1=low to 6=high in Africa Eastern and Southern as of 2025.
What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Africa Eastern and Southern and Guinea?
0.39 1=low to 6=high, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Eastern and Southern and Guinea?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Africa Eastern and Southern and Guinea rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 36th and Guinea ranks 37th of 42 groups.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa Eastern and Southern vs Guinea: IDA resource allocation index. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/ida-resource-allocation-index-1-low-to-6-high/africa-eastern-and-southern/guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/ida-resource-allocation-index-1-low-to-6-high/africa-eastern-and-southern/guinea/">Africa Eastern and Southern vs Guinea: IDA resource allocation index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).