Africa Eastern and Southern vs Mongolia: IDA resource allocation index
IDA resource allocation index over time
- Africa Eastern and Southern
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 3.36 1=low to 6=high against 2.96 1=low to 6=high in Africa Eastern and Southern, a difference of 0.4 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Africa Eastern and Southern's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 36th and Mongolia ranks 35th of 42 groups.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa Eastern and Southern | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.13 1=low to 6=high | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | 0.2411 1=low to 6=high | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 3.08 1=low to 6=high | 3.34 1=low to 6=high | 0.2649 1=low to 6=high | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Africa Eastern and Southern or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 3.36 1=low to 6=high against 2.96 1=low to 6=high in Africa Eastern and Southern as of 2019.
- What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Africa Eastern and Southern and Mongolia?
- 0.4 1=low to 6=high, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Eastern and Southern and Mongolia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Africa Eastern and Southern and Mongolia rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
- Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 36th and Mongolia ranks 35th of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).