Angola vs Timor-Leste: IDA resource allocation index
IDA resource allocation index over time
- Angola
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 2.81 1=low to 6=high against 2.67 1=low to 6=high in Angola, a difference of 0.14 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
Angola ranks 74th and Timor-Leste ranks 71st of 84 countries.
Timor-Leste has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.72 1=low to 6=high | 2.77 1=low to 6=high | 0.0563 1=low to 6=high | Timor-Leste |
| 2010s | 2.7 1=low to 6=high | 3.02 1=low to 6=high | 0.3229 1=low to 6=high | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Angola or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 2.81 1=low to 6=high against 2.67 1=low to 6=high in Angola as of 2025.
- What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Angola and Timor-Leste?
- 0.14 1=low to 6=high, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Timor-Leste?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2013.
- How do Angola and Timor-Leste rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
- Angola ranks 74th and Timor-Leste ranks 71st of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).