Bolivia vs Nepal: IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high)
IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high) over time
- Bolivia
- Nepal
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 3.45 1=low to 6=high against 3.37 1=low to 6=high in Nepal, a difference of 0.08 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Bolivia has been ahead every year.
Bolivia ranks 33rd and Nepal ranks 35th of 85 countries.
Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.75 1=low to 6=high | 3.36 1=low to 6=high | 0.39 1=low to 6=high | Bolivia |
| 2010s | 3.59 1=low to 6=high | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | 0.2542 1=low to 6=high | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Bolivia or Nepal?
- Bolivia, at 3.45 1=low to 6=high against 3.37 1=low to 6=high in Nepal as of 2015.
- What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Bolivia and Nepal?
- 0.08 1=low to 6=high, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Nepal?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
- How do Bolivia and Nepal rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
- Bolivia ranks 33rd and Nepal ranks 35th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).