Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: IDA resource allocation index

Bolivia, Plurinational State of
3.45 1=low to 6=high
in 2015
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
3.44 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
33rd
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
34th

IDA resource allocation index over time

  • Bolivia, Plurinational State of
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
01234200520152025

How they compare

Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 3.45 1=low to 6=high against 3.44 1=low to 6=high in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.01 1=low to 6=high.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.

Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 33rd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 34th of 85 countries.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia, Plurinational State of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
2000s 3.75 1=low to 6=high 3.83 1=low to 6=high 0.085 1=low to 6=high Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2010s 3.59 1=low to 6=high 3.71 1=low to 6=high 0.1264 1=low to 6=high Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 3.45 1=low to 6=high against 3.44 1=low to 6=high in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2015.
What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
0.01 1=low to 6=high, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 33rd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 34th of 85 countries.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: IDA resource allocation index. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/ida-resource-allocation-index-1-low-to-6-high/bolivia/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/ida-resource-allocation-index-1-low-to-6-high/bolivia/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: IDA resource allocation index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).