Cambodia vs Other small states: IDA resource allocation index
IDA resource allocation index over time
- Cambodia
- Other small states
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 3.55 1=low to 6=high against 3.15 1=low to 6=high in Other small states, a difference of 0.4 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.1 times Other small states's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Other small states ahead.
Cambodia ranks 24th and Other small states ranks 21st of 84 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 2 and Other small states in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Other small states | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.21 1=low to 6=high | 3.27 1=low to 6=high | 0.061 1=low to 6=high | Other small states |
| 2010s | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 0.1499 1=low to 6=high | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 3.53 1=low to 6=high | 3.19 1=low to 6=high | 0.3374 1=low to 6=high | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Cambodia or Other small states?
- Cambodia, at 3.55 1=low to 6=high against 3.15 1=low to 6=high in Other small states as of 2025.
- What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Cambodia and Other small states?
- 0.4 1=low to 6=high, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Other small states?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Cambodia and Other small states rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
- Cambodia ranks 24th and Other small states ranks 21st of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).