Central African Republic vs Guinea-Bissau: IDA resource allocation index
IDA resource allocation index over time
- Central African Republic
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 2.66 1=low to 6=high against 2.58 1=low to 6=high in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.08 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 77th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 76th of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Guinea-Bissau in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.49 1=low to 6=high | 2.62 1=low to 6=high | 0.13 1=low to 6=high | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 2.56 1=low to 6=high | 2.55 1=low to 6=high | 0.0183 1=low to 6=high | Central African Republic |
| 2020s | 2.58 1=low to 6=high | 2.55 1=low to 6=high | 0.0375 1=low to 6=high | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Central African Republic or Guinea-Bissau?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 2.66 1=low to 6=high against 2.58 1=low to 6=high in Central African Republic as of 2025.
- What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Central African Republic and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.08 1=low to 6=high, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Guinea-Bissau?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Central African Republic and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
- Central African Republic ranks 77th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 76th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).