Chad vs Sao Tome and Principe: IDA resource allocation index
IDA resource allocation index over time
- Chad
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 2.94 1=low to 6=high against 2.93 1=low to 6=high in Chad, a difference of 0.01 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 64th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 63rd of 85 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.64 1=low to 6=high | 2.97 1=low to 6=high | 0.3283 1=low to 6=high | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 2.63 1=low to 6=high | 3.06 1=low to 6=high | 0.425 1=low to 6=high | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2020s | 2.77 1=low to 6=high | 2.95 1=low to 6=high | 0.1792 1=low to 6=high | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Chad or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 2.94 1=low to 6=high against 2.93 1=low to 6=high in Chad as of 2025.
- What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Chad and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.01 1=low to 6=high, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Chad and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
- Chad ranks 64th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 63rd of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).