Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Vanuatu: IDA resource allocation index
IDA resource allocation index over time
- Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Vanuatu currently reports 3.24 1=low to 6=high against 3.18 1=low to 6=high in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 0.06 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Vanuatu has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 49th and Vanuatu ranks 48th of 85 countries.
Vanuatu has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of the Congo | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.78 1=low to 6=high | 3.24 1=low to 6=high | 0.465 1=low to 6=high | Vanuatu |
| 2010s | 2.85 1=low to 6=high | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 0.5483 1=low to 6=high | Vanuatu |
| 2020s | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | 3.31 1=low to 6=high | 0.2139 1=low to 6=high | Vanuatu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Vanuatu?
- Vanuatu, at 3.24 1=low to 6=high against 3.18 1=low to 6=high in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Vanuatu?
- 0.06 1=low to 6=high, with Vanuatu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Vanuatu?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Vanuatu rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
- Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 49th and Vanuatu ranks 48th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).