Congo, Republic of vs Micronesia, Federated States of: IDA resource allocation index

Congo, Republic of
2.84 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Micronesia, Federated States of
2.82 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Congo, Republic of rank
69th
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
70th

IDA resource allocation index over time

  • Congo, Republic of
  • Micronesia, Federated States of
0123200520152025

How they compare

Congo, Republic of currently reports 2.84 1=low to 6=high against 2.82 1=low to 6=high in Micronesia, Federated States of, a difference of 0.02 1=low to 6=high.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Congo, Republic of ahead.

Congo, Republic of ranks 69th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 70th of 84 countries.

Congo, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Republic of Micronesia, Federated States of Difference Ahead
2010s 2.89 1=low to 6=high 2.73 1=low to 6=high 0.163 1=low to 6=high Congo, Republic of
2020s 2.8 1=low to 6=high 2.78 1=low to 6=high 0.0194 1=low to 6=high Congo, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Congo, Republic of or Micronesia, Federated States of?
Congo, Republic of, at 2.84 1=low to 6=high against 2.82 1=low to 6=high in Micronesia, Federated States of as of 2025.
What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Congo, Republic of and Micronesia, Federated States of?
0.02 1=low to 6=high, with Congo, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Republic of and Micronesia, Federated States of?
15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
How do Congo, Republic of and Micronesia, Federated States of rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
Congo, Republic of ranks 69th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 70th of 84 countries.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Republic of vs Micronesia, Federated States of: IDA resource allocation index. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/ida-resource-allocation-index-1-low-to-6-high/congo-rep/micronesia-fed-sts/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/ida-resource-allocation-index-1-low-to-6-high/congo-rep/micronesia-fed-sts/">Congo, Republic of vs Micronesia, Federated States of: IDA resource allocation index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).