Congo vs Tuvalu: IDA resource allocation index
IDA resource allocation index over time
- Congo
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 2.86 1=low to 6=high against 2.84 1=low to 6=high in Congo, a difference of 0.02 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 69th and Tuvalu ranks 66th of 84 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Tuvalu in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.88 1=low to 6=high | 2.84 1=low to 6=high | 0.0438 1=low to 6=high | Congo |
| 2020s | 2.8 1=low to 6=high | 2.85 1=low to 6=high | 0.0458 1=low to 6=high | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ida resource allocation index, Congo or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 2.86 1=low to 6=high against 2.84 1=low to 6=high in Congo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in ida resource allocation index between Congo and Tuvalu?
- 0.02 1=low to 6=high, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Tuvalu?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Tuvalu rank globally for ida resource allocation index?
- Congo ranks 69th and Tuvalu ranks 66th of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).